10/30/2022 0 Comments Limechat suppress join leave![]() ![]() > Why should they waste time and engineering effort on supporting massive non-teams when it is in no way their core focus? Now look at what happened - instead of making slack look good now this blog post will show up showing how unprofessional they are. Marketing? That's another stamp they can put on their list of users. > Why on earth would they waste time and effort on doing that? Slack doesn't seem to be intended to do this! Please don't do this! The main reason I wrote this post is to provide a cautionary tale to other open-membership organizations who are considering using Slack. We can't pause our community growth while we wait for Slack to engineer around their undisclosed user limit. Slack may be able to fix its sluggishness for these other communities, and someone might build integrations that routinely export then delete messages so as to stay below the 10,000 message limit and remove the warnings. Like I said, I'm pretty sure we're the first community to hit this limit.īig online courses, for example, routinely draw 100,000s of students, and might make the same mistake we did (Harvard's CS50 class did). The real problem is that they have an undocumented user limit. Slack does nothing to discourage this, aside from posting warnings about archiving messages. I want to point out that communities are increasingly using Slack, and many of them are also in the thousands of users. There is a lot of merit to your criticisms of my decision making. Then you could be in two "classes" and be sure the same person is the same person in both or Slack could even consolidate their Direct Message threads into a single one shared between both teams.) (The one thing I do think Slack is missing, is a way to easily share your "Slack identity" (username, avatar, client display prefs, etc.) between multiple Slack teams you're concurrently logged into. If I were to come up with a way to host a chat adjacent to a MOOC, though, I'd still probably use Slack I'd just have one Slack team for each instance of each course. Maybe Usenet (as a whole), IRC (an entire server, not a single channel), and Reddit (the code-base, run on your own server) are for societies. #Limechat suppress join leave softwareIn fact, very few pieces of software are designed to cope with use by societies. Slack is emphatically not for societies: groups big enough that people only know a small percentage of others, groups that must create "laws" to prevent random strangers abusing your shared infrastructure, etc. Slack can handle "communities"-effectively groups with a "team"-sized aristocracy and a bunch of rarely-visiting people who mainly interact in a hub-and-spoke fashion with the team. A lot of Slack's features are built to assume this "small group with a shared purpose where everyone can be trusted to fiddle with things" paradigm. Slack is for teams: small groups where everyone knows one-another by name, can be trusted with one-another's email-addresses and other contact information, can be trusted to only use triggers for important things, etc. ![]() Read this answer in context □ 0 All Replies (19)It's pretty clear that Slack is not, and never will be, built for this use-case. ![]() Thanks for your patience and understanding while not always particularly intuitive, Mozilla IRC network is a nice place to be in. I'm sorry that this is taking a long thread, but I'm sure that you would be able to use this as soon as you simply understand what waiting gives. Some may be staring in it non-stop if they are discussing something actively but that is not something they do 8 hours daily or something. People most usually leave IRC client minimised and peek in just sometimes few times during the day. I would simply recommend leaving your ChatZilla open and going to have dinner or something and then coming back, seeing what's new. If you could just try to join #firefox,#sumo,#chatzilla you would see a bot talking several times every 10 minutes (in #firefox) and generally #firefox is a largeer chanenl so talking to others would be easier. If there is only 3 people it could take weeks to see them do that they may be idling for a pretty long time. Yes, if the 2 others are chatting you would see them. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |